Monday, February 06, 2006

Learning and Learned

Are you Learned? Or are you Learning? You know what I mean. Are you…

Learned? Have you found your niche? Do you own and use great technology? Can you talk about it, wax eloquent? Are you comfortable with all the change around you? Are you confident in your beliefs and practices? Do you project that sureness? Or, are you…

Learning? A seeker? (No, not the Quidditch kind…) Are you a seeker of knowledge, of ideas and experiences? A hunter of new thinking of new skill sets of new truth and paradigms? Are you a little uncomfortable or not as confident (outside of therapy) with sharing your need to explore and experiment?

Why is it that so many seem to value the Learned over the Learning? Bring in the experts, the “best practices”, the seasoned consultants. Tell them how we do it, what we know works, etc… You’ve heard the mantra.

Why are we scared of learning with each other and with our clients? What weakness do we think we are exposing? Why does the learning curve often make us feel vulnerable and less valuable? Limited? Flawed?

Our industry is notoriously paranoid (and for good cause I might add!) and our Achilles Heel is often our need to show our depth; a move which sometimes shows how little real profundity there is in our thinking. After all it’s not brain surgery, right?  I wish I had a dollar every time I heard a colleague self-deprecate with that line!

So if I have depressed you, here is a thought to cheer you up:

“In times of profound change, the learners inherit the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists.”
- Al Rogers

So much for the meek. Think about the dinosaurs – they were beautifully suited to deal with their world. And then it didn’t exist…

Learners are not the meek. They are the aggressive ones, the uncomfortable squirmers who need to know and know more, to try and try more, to change, sometimes profoundly.

Be a Learner. Make your clients learners with you. In fact, bring your friends and family too. The journey is what makes for tight relationships. Standing still, even rock solid, still causes fatigue and erosion. Be profound because you confront profound change, not because you have the answers to the past.

Learning, by the way, doesn’t mean chucking the past – heaven forbid. That’s stupidity, plain and simple. Learning means building on the past, using the past for leverage, not getting caught in the time warp.

Be profound! Learn and learn some more and then pass it on and learn some more…

Posted by: David on 02/06 at 03:47 PM
Tagged:
(4) CommentsPermalink
  1. An analogy I like to refer to on this topic, "some people walk in the rain and some get wet". Meaning, are you the type of person who is willing to embrace what life has to throw at you, learning from your mistakes and your successes, taking an optimistic view on the world and accepting that things are not perfect or fair but that if you are TRUE TO YOURSELF at all times you will be living your life to the full and you will feel 'alive'. The people that 'get wet' are the 'learned', those who stay within their comfort zones and who are not willing to venture out of their 'cave'. People who are willing to learn are comfortable in their own skin. How can management get the most out of their employees? - by creating an organizational culture that is people-focused and not system-focused, by investing and encouraging their staff to 'learn' whether that is via training courses, field trips, hot-desking (short-term experiences in other offices worldwide)...etc.

    Posted by Lisa Cook  on  2006-02-07 11:15:35

  2. People are afraid of learning, because inevtitably learning means making mistakes. Not all culture are so open and willing to accept or more importantly admit to mistakes. The art is to turn those mistakes into positives and learnings, beacause that, in the end is what they are. A poorly performimg campaign can't be brushed under the carpet, it must be analysed and used to an even greater extent than a good one.

    Posted by Nick Annetts  on  2006-02-08 03:02:27

  3. yes yes yes - you all are right. but this reminds me of one of the first sayings we learned in school: "non scolae sed vitae discimus". for all you non-latin speakers: this means we do not learn for school but for life. the truth, nevertheless, was that if I got too much of a 6 (english: E), my teachers went: "hey, good thing you made some valuable experiences for life - but sorry, you'll have to repeat class". so, the system just turned it ad absurdum. I was a learner but should have been learned in order to advance. now, if "better learned than a learner" is teached at school (I'm sure they do it most of this world's cultures), you learn it. as the whole process of becoming a more and more learned person the older you get is being rewarded (not only with money), how can we change this behaviour? "oh yeah, being a learner is good - but being learned earns me the money" seems to me the modern interpretation of "non scolae sed vitae discimus". but even if we were all learners: let's take a look at our clients. clients are amongst the most fearful species in the world. in our daily work we try to encourage them - it takes courage to risk half a million euro when you only got one shot - but who are we to blame them for being learned if they say "no"? it just shows that life and business have different rules. maybe our client guys are learners in their private time, but when they enter the company they like morph to a different being. as this blog also is about our business, my opinion is that we - as wunderman - have to show them that being a learner rather than being learned pays both for them and their company. so (and this is the moment I look everyone deep in the eye), are we a good example to the client? really? or are we just another service provider who does everything the clients want because it's them who pay us? hm?

    Posted by Martin Steinhausen  on  2006-02-09 09:44:45

  4. to Martin : I guess we should not be wondering this, or at least this should not be more important for you than "I know where I am and I know where I'm taking my client to". Because if you ask the question you position yourself in the "learning" part. Which is good, of course, because it demands putting yourself into question, facing your client, do your own checklist. But if I was a client, I would prefer to have someone who's strong on its feets as you need to be in the rugby scrum. And this is also for your "Wunderman" part of the question. Big network, big agencies, big clients, is reassuring for a client. This automatically deletes competition with a lot of other agencies "from around the corner". But a side effect is the "big" thing as it's harder for us to be as reactive as our clients would need sometimes. this is why we try to teach them anticipation. And I'm sure it's the right way, as anticipation will help them in every side of their business. Anyway this becomes kind of boring no ? Let's just say we, as Wunderman, are a great RM agency for our clients and if there's better somewhere else (and I hope so), we try everyday to improve what we have to reach this "better".

    Posted by Ningre Alexandre  on  2006-02-09 13:31:23

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2