Monday, September 24, 2007
Mime
“The world is getting smaller” was once an excuse for creating globally homogenized communications programs. And, by the way, it is still being done and in many instances successfully.
Silent Movie, 1976...only spoken words in the movie
Posted by Dan Zinman on 2007-09-24 15:26:07
Mel Brook's Silent Movie
Posted by Cindy Shackelford Fite on 2007-09-24 15:28:29
The Silent Movie - Mel Brooks the word was "NON !"
Posted by Alexandre on 2007-09-24 15:30:47
Mel Brooks' "Silent Movie" (he says 'non' when asked if he'll be in the movie)
Posted by wayne berry on 2007-09-24 15:30:55
"Silent Movie" He says, "Non!"
Posted by BJ Zink on 2007-09-24 15:32:20
Monday, September 17, 2007
Listening
Do we really listen? Do we really listen as “to pay attention; heed; obey’—as defined by the dictionary?
Or do we just hear—as in “to perceive by the ear “—also as defined by the dictionary.
One of the problems with listening vs. hearing is that people get caught up in what they think will or should be said. In an effort to proove our theories right, we often listen to what supports our hypothesis and merely hear what doesn't, dismissing those parts as mere fluff or nonsense. We use this technique to not only proove our ideas correct, but also to achieve individual aims and short-sighted decisions. Unfortunately this isn't limited to client relationships, but occurs in all avenues of business interaction.
Posted by dawn moser on 2007-09-17 16:51:31
AH!! but then you are not really listening as defined by the above -- if you dont act on what you hear -- you have only heard...
Posted by david sable on 2007-09-17 17:02:46
exactly!
Posted by dawn moser on 2007-09-17 18:15:49
Monday, September 10, 2007
Vacuum Tubes
As I plugged in my computer on the plane last night—I did some work, while listening to music from my hard drive. And lest you think I’m pandering (or looking for the sympathy vote or worse, “the look how hard I work spiel”), I actually spent more time watching 300 (a movie worth seeing) with my noise-buster headphones in full screen, up close and personal, than I did in PowerPoint or Word…
"What were they (the editors of Popular Mechanics) thinking? Was it a lack of imagination or a lack of vision? Or did they just not have enough “critical mass” in High Tech to be able to envision the future as we are now experiencing it." They weren't lacking anything. You immediately applied their comment to an infinite horizon. They were correct...for 5-6 years in the future. The article doesn’t say by when that shrinking of computers will happen...nor does it say that’s as small as they’ll ever become. They failed to see the invention of the transistor. By definition, you can’t predict timing of paradigm shifts. You can say that they’ll happen...but you can’t say when, or to what magnitude. The invention of transistors changed the entire future of integrated circuits. What are WE missing? The ability to quickly adopt those shifts in our industry, and revise our vision based on them. How long has it taken us to truly absorb one-to-one marketing, even though the technology has been available for a dozen years? Have we even been able to truly understand what it is we’re trying to do in that space? Have we succeeded anywhere along that front? Or have we merely moved the needle closer to the vision? We’re often so stuck in our own paradigms (“Isn’t Wunderman the direct mail company?”) that we fail to seize upon the new...or trying to apply our old ways of thinking to new technologies and capabilities.
Posted by Glenn White on 2007-09-10 17:28:11
Even people who are forward thinkers get caught up in the status quo. " I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." Thomas watson, CEO, IBM, 1943 We all need to think beyond the present horizon.
Posted by Richard Tooker on 2007-09-10 22:49:39
My point -- so how do we anticipate transistors in a world where we cannot even fathom their creation? Look at Jules Verne; Asimov; vs real scientists -- seems to me that often the creators are more limited -- despite their brilliance -- than the sheer creative types who relish teh ideas but are not limited by their own technolgy
Posted by david sable on 2007-09-11 17:15:29
RECENT POSTS
- Did you ever laugh at a new idea?
- Where do ideas come from?
- Are you a Creationist?
- Network
- History
- The Box
- Putting Up
- Outcomes
- Celebs
- CPM
TAG CLOUD
social networking intuitively clearly nature complex
ARCHIVES
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- COMPLETE ARCHIVES

