Monday, September 24, 2007

Mime

“The world is getting smaller” was once an excuse for creating globally homogenized communications programs.  And, by the way, it is still being done and in many instances successfully.

Read on...>>

Posted by: David on 09/24 at 09:17 AM
Tagged:
(16) CommentsPermalink
  1. Silent Movie, 1976...only spoken words in the movie

    Posted by Dan Zinman  on  2007-09-24 15:26:07

  2. Mel Brook's Silent Movie

    Posted by Cindy Shackelford Fite  on  2007-09-24 15:28:29

  3. The Silent Movie - Mel Brooks the word was "NON !"

    Posted by Alexandre  on  2007-09-24 15:30:47

  4. Mel Brooks' "Silent Movie" (he says 'non' when asked if he'll be in the movie)

    Posted by wayne berry  on  2007-09-24 15:30:55

  5. "Silent Movie" He says, "Non!"

    Posted by BJ Zink  on  2007-09-24 15:32:20

Monday, September 17, 2007

Listening

Do we really listen? Do we really listen as “to pay attention; heed; obey’—as defined by the dictionary?
Or do we just hear—as in “to perceive by the ear “—also as defined by the dictionary.

Read on...>>

Posted by: David on 09/17 at 09:39 AM
Tagged:
(3) CommentsPermalink
  1. One of the problems with listening vs. hearing is that people get caught up in what they think will or should be said. In an effort to proove our theories right, we often listen to what supports our hypothesis and merely hear what doesn't, dismissing those parts as mere fluff or nonsense. We use this technique to not only proove our ideas correct, but also to achieve individual aims and short-sighted decisions. Unfortunately this isn't limited to client relationships, but occurs in all avenues of business interaction.

    Posted by dawn moser  on  2007-09-17 16:51:31

  2. AH!! but then you are not really listening as defined by the above -- if you dont act on what you hear -- you have only heard...

    Posted by david sable  on  2007-09-17 17:02:46

  3. exactly!

    Posted by dawn moser  on  2007-09-17 18:15:49

Monday, September 10, 2007

Vacuum Tubes

As I plugged in my computer on the plane last night—I did some work, while listening to music from my hard drive.  And lest you think I’m pandering (or looking for the sympathy vote or worse, “the look how hard I work spiel”), I actually spent more time watching 300 (a movie worth seeing) with my noise-buster headphones in full screen, up close and personal, than I did in PowerPoint or Word…

Read on...>>

Posted by: David on 09/10 at 10:56 AM
Tagged:
(3) CommentsPermalink
  1. "What were they (the editors of Popular Mechanics) thinking? Was it a lack of imagination or a lack of vision? Or did they just not have enough “critical mass” in High Tech to be able to envision the future as we are now experiencing it." They weren't lacking anything. You immediately applied their comment to an infinite horizon. They were correct...for 5-6 years in the future. The article doesn’t say by when that shrinking of computers will happen...nor does it say that’s as small as they’ll ever become. They failed to see the invention of the transistor. By definition, you can’t predict timing of paradigm shifts. You can say that they’ll happen...but you can’t say when, or to what magnitude. The invention of transistors changed the entire future of integrated circuits. What are WE missing? The ability to quickly adopt those shifts in our industry, and revise our vision based on them. How long has it taken us to truly absorb one-to-one marketing, even though the technology has been available for a dozen years? Have we even been able to truly understand what it is we’re trying to do in that space? Have we succeeded anywhere along that front? Or have we merely moved the needle closer to the vision? We’re often so stuck in our own paradigms (“Isn’t Wunderman the direct mail company?”) that we fail to seize upon the new...or trying to apply our old ways of thinking to new technologies and capabilities.

    Posted by Glenn White  on  2007-09-10 17:28:11

  2. Even people who are forward thinkers get caught up in the status quo. " I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." Thomas watson, CEO, IBM, 1943 We all need to think beyond the present horizon.

    Posted by Richard Tooker  on  2007-09-10 22:49:39

  3. My point -- so how do we anticipate transistors in a world where we cannot even fathom their creation? Look at Jules Verne; Asimov; vs real scientists -- seems to me that often the creators are more limited -- despite their brilliance -- than the sheer creative types who relish teh ideas but are not limited by their own technolgy

    Posted by david sable  on  2007-09-11 17:15:29

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >