Monday, February 13, 2006
Danger
Last week I asked why we are uncomfortable “learning”. That is, why are we uncomfortable appearing before our clients with propositions that are new and untried and inviting them to join us on the journey of discovery? This week I’d like to continue that thought and see what you think…
I have thought about this issue for some time now. It's my feeling that the nature of the agency, and in particular the direct marketing agency, contributes in large part to people's fear of creativity, individuality, risk-taking. In my view, the agency (any agency, or most agencies) is extremely conservative as a place of business, because success is attained through systemization and process. You need to execute, get the work out the door, quickly. The only way to do that is to have very set processes, rules to follow, clear delineation of roles and responsibilities. And that means very specific, fairly rigid career paths (you are Creative, Account, Strategy - and so you will remain). That is how agencies survive - by getting it all down to a science, this art of marketing. But the more formulaic your output, the more narrow your professional growth choices, the harder it is to think outside of the agency box. I sense this is more pronounced in direct marketing, where formulas play an even more critical role in decision-making, planning, projecting ROI. It is a Catch 22. Chaos is unacceptable, but so is an excess of order. Order left unchecked can take over as the mental default, the cognitive override that stops ideas from getting from their nascent state to a PowerPoint chart and ultimately to a line item in your client's marketing budget. Order becomes protection from danger - to your client's sales, to your agency's fees, to your career. So what is the answer? It seems to me that if agencies want their employees to seek out danger, then they must do what any company (even a services company with shrinking margins) needs to do to change employee behavior: encourage, enable and reward that change in behavior. In other words, take clear, concrete, specific steps to loosen the perceived reigns on risk-taking. Agencies just might begin to loosen the grip of ingrained ORGANIZATIONAL behavior as well - the largely unchallenged behavior that places structure, form and order above all else.
Posted by Deb Arnold on 2006-02-14 00:52:04
Deb makes a very valid point. It is possible that it is less about the fear of change more about the fear of disappointment in performance. It is about the nature of business. We are often asked to perform quickly and to base ideas, strategies, campaigns and tactics on previous success so that our supervisors and clients are comfortable with the risk and so that we can manage expectations. Most agencies are full of smart, forward thinking people that would cherish the opportunity to try something new but do not have the time to prove to their clients that it is worth the risk. While it is admirable that we work to be stewards for our clients’ success it does at times follow a pattern in which new ideas are not allowed to be tested. However, this will have to change as the tried and true of yesterday may no longer work tomorrow. Many agencies are seeing that we no longer have a choice but to try new ideas as consumers begin to shift their communication behaviors. We will not be able to ignore the reality of media fragmentation. To reach consumers we will need to be innovative and leverage new technology to break through and engage consumers. Our clients will hold us accountable for being able to change as their consumers change or they will find agencies that can. For those individuals and agencies who already understand this it promises to be a very exciting adventure. “To improve is to change, to be perfect is to change often.” – Winston Churchill
Posted by Joe Grigsby on 2006-02-14 13:51:44
I disagree that a great idea has to be a dangerous one. An idea is an idea, whether it is safe, dangerous, weird, interesting...etc. I do agree that 'fear' does hold a lot of people back and I think the reason varies with the individual - from fear of the unknown to fear of being judged to fear of fear... HOPE is the feeling that conquers all fears and that pushes people along their journey of discovery. This is why it is important that an organisation always dangles the 'carrot' to motivate their staff along their various career paths. It is also true that there is no point in sitting back and waiting for life/management/people to come to you - "don't wait for the ship to come in - swim out to it"...
Posted by Lisa Cook on 2006-02-14 15:04:37
RECENT POSTS
- Simplicity
- Are you normal?
- Is there anything more frustrating
- How do we best judge innovation? Particularly technological innovation?Messenger Boys
- Click Here
- La rentrée
- Have you been watching?
- Every Dog Hath his Day
- Quote for a dog day afternoon
- A Thought for an August Morning
TAG CLOUD
idea business technology target social networking advertising innovative communication perception intuitively the best conversation creative leadership complex focus relationship imagination clearly idea portrayal marketing client curiosity nature results
ARCHIVES
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- COMPLETE ARCHIVES

