Monday, February 25, 2008

Insight

Insight. The ability to see clearly and intuitively into the nature of a complex person, situation, or subject.

Insight is the greatest competitive edge in our business—in any business. Still.

Insight is what drives a company to launch a product that the experts claim will fail—see Walkman.  Insight is what changes a boring category forever—see NIKE.  Insight is what compels people to use one service over another—see Google.  Insight is what drives people to buy and buy again—see Amazon.

What makes insight critical is that it deals with the nature of the issue—the deeper meaning, the motivation, the reason. And, it can often be pre-data.

Pre-Data??

Let me explain.  Before the Walkman there were no sales or usage data that could be analyzed or modeled to predict sales of a non-recording portable cassette player. In fact, had you used data alone, you would have concluded that there was no sales potential…as many did, including GE.

To be fair, had you done consumer insight work—interviews, focus groups, usage labs, whatever, I believe an insightful analyst could have used cross industry sales and usage data to draw analogies and to paint an even richer picture of the potential, even though it wasn’t exactly apples to apples. But again, the process would have to begin with real deep consumer insight as in clear and intuitive. I’d argue that the iPod years later didn’t need the deep insight, already proven, but rich analytics using real sales and usage data.  Ah!!!!

Make the analogies for Nike, Google and Amazon; it’s all very clear.

We don’t use insight enough.  We don’t spend enough time digging deeply into consumer’s needs and motivations, desires and wishes.  While we know a lot, we don’t know everything.  If we did, industry conversion rates would be higher and so would sales.

So, you know I bought something.  You know how much I paid.  You know how I paid and maybe even where I sent it.  And you know what I bought previously.  But do you know why?  And why is the key to exponential business.

Check this out:  http://youtube.com/watch?v=D3qltEtl7H8

It’s the danger of thinking we know everything…

Or try this:  Wired; Issue March 2008; 16.03 (not yet posted on line) story called The Netflix Challenge by JordanEllenberg

So here is the thought:

A desk is a dangerous place from which to watch the world.
~John le Carre

If what we bring to the table is strictly what we pull from digital sources we are shortchanging ourselves and our clients and our business.  Our greatest competitive advantage is to take deep understanding, link it to deep knowledge, overlay brilliant analytics and modeling and continue to learn.

Key words. Nature. Clearly; Intuitively; Complex.

Get out there.  Work in the bank. Sell a car.  Answer an insurance call.  Watch people use computer products.  And then, look at data.  You will bring clarity to a complex world.

Posted by David on 02/25 at 10:04 AM
(8) CommentsPermalink
  1. Great piece! I completely agree, but more than this, I hope this becomes an invite for planners to move away from traditional research of insights, or at least to use new - the one you suggest - way to get under the skin of a prototype customer. I think is no longer an option avoiding to investigate the 'why', because even similar profiles will have different reasons to buy the same product, in the same place at the same time. And that's why the future is more and more one-to-one conversation with consumers.

    Posted by Maria Teresa  on  2008-02-25 17:00:27

  2. Loved this weeks ramble...and completely agree with what both you and John Le Carre are saying!FYI http://bringtheloveback.com/ is the guy who started the consumer / advertiser video viral that you posted in your post this week - his name is Geert and he actually works for Microsoft in Singapore. It's great to see his motivation behind why he produced this piece of digital video content.

    Posted by Jessica Michaels  on  2008-02-25 18:27:03

  3. lets get him to speak to us!

    Posted by david sable  on  2008-02-25 22:24:49

  4. Insight. I like insight as foresight but seldom has this been the case for me. "Insight as hindsight" is OK for a journalist or historian, but 'the hopeful we' hope to build the future, or some part of it (with the client). Insight from the tillerman, not from an inquest...

    Posted by Tom Osborn  on  2008-02-26 09:16:05

  5. [Need to post this, too]. The esteemed economist Robert Solow established (in the 50s) that over 80% of economic growth arose from "technical progress", not labor, capital or organisation. "Technical progress" meant innovation plus insight (in the hindsight sense, unfortunately). Doing something clever, wierd and wonderful isn't enough. The insight in this case is that the PARTICULAR innovation has a good place in the world (and other "clever ideas" don't). That kind of insight, if foresight and even a tad reliable, is tradeable, and not a simple commodity...

    Posted by Tom Osborn  on  2008-02-26 10:23:03

Page 1 of 1 pages