Monday, September 17, 2007
Listening
Do we really listen? Do we really listen as “to pay attention; heed; obey’—as defined by the dictionary?
Or do we just hear—as in “to perceive by the ear “—also as defined by the dictionary.
I am not playing semantic games. One is passive the other is not only active it has an action associated with it. Do you see it?
We claim to listen. That claim is a corporate claim. It’s a differentiating claim—a claim of capability that we tell clients and prospects about. But do we really listen? Are we actively listening? More important, are we completing the act of listening by heeding and obeying?
Lester will tell you that the key to success in our business always has been listening. Listening gives you insight. And insight can be acted on; so the chain works and listening is real. You pay attention to your customer; you heed their needs and obey their wishes… What could be better for creating real relationships?
In our Internet-centric world, listening has more promise; it opens up more opportunity and can be even more real than ever before. We are real time, or close to it. We can react quickly; we can personalize as close to “one to one” as we will ever get and closest if we really listen (see the definition again…).
And yet, are we really listening? Spam is a growing problem and many of our clients contribute to it just as they do in the physical mailing world by over-contacting customers, by using lists that are too general and large or by not looking for life time value but rather for quick, short term hits.
Are we really listening or do we substitute computer programs based on sets of business rules for real insight? Are we really listening or are we still relying on volume and declaring victory with small percentages of returns? Are we really listening or are we only hearing?
You tell me. But I do know given the ability we now have to really listen—to really react and even more to be pro-active—I question and question again…
One of my favorite philosophers said it best:
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
~Groucho Marx
Ask yourself: are you sending for the child of 5?
One of the problems with listening vs. hearing is that people get caught up in what they think will or should be said. In an effort to proove our theories right, we often listen to what supports our hypothesis and merely hear what doesn't, dismissing those parts as mere fluff or nonsense. We use this technique to not only proove our ideas correct, but also to achieve individual aims and short-sighted decisions. Unfortunately this isn't limited to client relationships, but occurs in all avenues of business interaction.
Posted by dawn moser on 2007-09-17 16:51:31
AH!! but then you are not really listening as defined by the above -- if you dont act on what you hear -- you have only heard...
Posted by david sable on 2007-09-17 17:02:46
exactly!
Posted by dawn moser on 2007-09-17 18:15:49
RECENT POSTS
- Simplicity
- Are you normal?
- Is there anything more frustrating
- How do we best judge innovation? Particularly technological innovation?Messenger Boys
- Click Here
- La rentrée
- Have you been watching?
- Every Dog Hath his Day
- Quote for a dog day afternoon
- A Thought for an August Morning
TAG CLOUD
idea business technology target social networking advertising innovative communication perception intuitively the best conversation creative leadership complex focus relationship imagination clearly idea portrayal marketing client curiosity nature results
ARCHIVES
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- COMPLETE ARCHIVES

